Thursday, November 15, 2012

Research proposal: Culmination of 6540


The mini proposal culminates your learning in 6540.  The proposal writing process can be a model for a thesis proposal or simply an article sized research project.   There are three relevant links on the syllabus for this assignment, but here I would like to spell out the key steps.

Assignment timing clarification:  

Nov 20:   Due: a brief description of your preferred proposal topic.  Create this as a google doc that slightly expands on the topic that you chose from those posted in #1 below.  We will discuss these in class.  See the updated course schedule.

Nov 27:   Due:  draft 1 of your proposal + in-class 5 min presentation.  Write this in the same google doc from last week. Presentation #1 of your proposal.

Dec 4:  Due:  draft 2 of your proposal.   Final presentation for 1/2 of proposals.

Finals week:   Due final draft of your proposal.    Final presentation for other 1/2 of proposals.


  1. Propose three options (feel free to indicate your preferred option, and to develop that option more).  Those proposals should be about 1 paragraph, and are informal, but should be as informative as possible so I can help you chart a good initial path. Where do you submit these, and what should they look like?  
    1. What do I mean by three different options?  Some people might have three different topics of interest.  But most folks will likely have one main research area of interest.  For these folks the strategy should be to articulate three different ways to approach the topic, or to frame the sample, or to employ alternative methods.  This would let me give you better feedback on those alternatives.
    2. Go to the google spreadsheet and see examples from earlier years, and to compose and enter your proposal ideas. Here is the link to do that: Describe possible topic ideas
  2. Compose draft 1 of your research proposal.  After settling on one topic (and getting feedback from me, posted to that same spreadsheet) you should begin crafting a research proposal.  I have described the basic sections and provided a link to a successful example from an earlier year.  The example is the final draft, so it is a bit longer and a bit more developed than your first draft is likely to be.  Nonetheless is demonstrates style and quality that I expect to see in your work.  
    1.  Draft one assignment description;  example of final draft
    2. Once you have settled on the version of your topic that you prefer, you need to start writing your proposal right away.   I want you to use google docs to write the proposal so that two of your peers can give you feedback on it.   These peers should have edit and comment access to your document.  
  3. Help each other write better.   We will discuss this in greater detail on Tuesday, but you should work to read and understand the work of your peers and help them make it better.   Here are three easy ways:
    1. Every paragraph should have a thesis, and every thesis should be expressed in a thesis sentence.  Usually, when we write we are creating some new ideas, and we do not initially know our thesis until after writing the paragraph.  So, for a friend, you can help them by trying to distill a thesis sentence from their paragraph.   
    2. Reflect on the goals of academic writing and help your friends write more directly and clearly.  One way to do this is to simply the construction of sentences.  Another is to make the organization of the paragraphs better reflect the organization of their thesis.  In the first case, you can offer a rewritten version of a sentence.  In the second you can suggest a renumbering of the order of the paragraphs.
    3. Refine single sentences for clarity.  Find a sentence where you think you understand the intended goal of the sentence and help it accomplish that goal with greater clarity.  Oftentimes this means employing a simpler construction and using a more active voice. 

Friday, November 2, 2012

Homework #3 and Homework #4




Instructions:

How to turn it in:  Type up your answers on a word doc or on google docs. Then go to crowdgrader and copy and paste your answers into the corresponding question spaces for homeworks #3, and, about a week later, for homework #4.

How to study:   Please discuss the questions, ideas and answers in person, via google hangouts and online via a google doc class study guide.


The questions:

Quantitative Data Collection and Analysis
Many times people who analyze quantitative data are not the same people who collected it.   The secondary analysis of survey data is very common, and results from the fact that good data is costly and difficult to collect, and, good research projects will allow for many questions to be asked with the same overall dataset.  

1a.   Use chapters 10, 11, 12 (from Neuman) to discuss some important attributes (include both advantages and challenges/disadvantages) of the secondary use of quantitative data to construct research projects.   

1b.  Illustrate your points using examples from at least two of Derek Kreager’s research papers discussed during weeks 9 and 10.



Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis

Qualitative data collection and analysis presents researchers with wonderful opportunities to do innovative research.  Ethnographic field research in particular has proven to be one of the primary strategies that our MA students have used for their projects.   

2a.   Describe all of the most important attributes of a successful field research study and the things that you would do to make sure that a MA thesis that you might write would be of high quality.  Be sure to reference Neuman chapters 13, 15 and work discussed in class or posted to Gooogle+.

2b.  Illustrate attributes of successful ethnographic field research by referencing concrete examples (quote sections of text, and interpret them) found in any of the ethnographic dissertations we read or published ethnographic books.

2c.  Describe the advantages and disadvantages to starting your research career with an ethnographic MA thesis.





Crash Course in Statistics for Sociological Research
Course materials

Review chapter 5 of Agresti and Finlay.   Pay special attention to section 5.4.

3a.  Suppose that you want to use survey methods in a thesis sized research project (choose any topic that interests you).  Use the concepts discussed on pages 135 to 141 to explain what sample size you will aim for.   Do not neglect the issues raised on page 141.   



Crash Course in Statistics for Sociological Research

Review chapter 9 of Agresti and Finlay and take a look at this plot.


4a.   Provide an accurate but non-technical explanation of what correlation and linear regression are and what they are used to estimate.

4b.   Explain how the point in the upper right influences the estimates (in a general way) and explain the type of problem that outliers present for these types of quantitative analyses.   Describe how two different strategies can be used to address this problem.  One involves the sampling frame, and the other should involve the use of multiple regression.  Explain your logic.  



Crash Course in Statistics for Sociological Research

Review Chapter 10 from Agresti and Finlay.   Understanding Chapter 10 is really important for making sense of the multiple regression analysis, like the analysis that you read in Kreager’s research.

5a.   Identify and briefly describe the most important findings from the Kreager study that you reviewed.   

5b.  Now, use the discussion of association, causation, and statistical control to explain how Derek eliminated alternative explanations and demonstrated evidence of causal relationships.  In other words, make explicit use of the general rules and ideas from chapter 10 to explain how Kreager analysed his results and therefore demonstrated his primary findings.